At the end of the 19th century, the "survival of the fittest" program was proposed in "Social Darwinism". The reason for this is probably due to the continuous breakthroughs in genetic engineering research, especially the fact that "cloning" has become a reality, which has made the status of eugenics re-emphasized, but the behind-the-scenes masters are reluctant to use "eugenics" again. The name was changed to a more neutral term such as "genetic engineering" to cover up. Furthermore, what is considered to be the best does not necessarily mean that it can perform well in different environments. Just like genetically modified plants, modified plants may not necessarily be able to grow and survive in any environment. The biggest worry is to create "monsters" that even humans can't control under constant breakthroughs!
As for the "Environmental Degradation" rumored in the 20th century, it is an academic field that studies the improvement of human genetic quality through unnatural or artificial means, and advocates manipulation and control of the evolutionary progress of a specific population, as well as the direction of evolution.
The evolution of the idea is to stop the growth of the garbage population.
The garbage population refers to the population that the elites consider to be mentally or physically weak, with low IQ and incapable of taking care of themselves, criminals and lazy people who make no contribution to society and only consume social resources.
ns 15.158.61.17da2
