Anonymous asked: can you tell me what your definition of abuse is and elaborate on how exactly sasusaku is "abusive" post-canonization?
No one can have ‘their’ definition of abuse, abuse is abuse.
There are verbal abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, psychological abuse, financial abuse… And SS has quite a few of those:
a) verbal abuse AND b) psychological abuse (there are way more examples)
c) physical abuse (it’s NOT from my Instagram before people accuse of calling Sakura useless because she isn’t)
d) sexual abuse
Having sex with someone with the purpose of getting pregnant to tie that person to them is also abuse, believe it or not. Even Kishi stated that Sarada was an unwanted pregnancy.
Also, though it’s not exactly abuse, disrespecting someone’s wishes and life choices for selfish reasons is bad too, which Sakura does all the time.
SAKURA NEVER GAVE A SHIT ABOUT SASUKE’S CHOICES AND SASUKE NEVER GAVE A SHIT ABOUT SAKURA’S FEELINGS! AND THAT’S CANON!
Also, post canonization, you can’t have abuse if you don’t have interaction between those two characters alone, though whenever they are together with other characters their relationships isn’t healthy either like:
a) him refusing to kiss her
b) acting completely blunt when she got sucked into transportation
c) saying that they’re connected only because of a kid
d) she having to hug him through Sarada because she knows he wouldn’t hug her himself
Sweet bonus: how SS would look like in real life:
Would you consider THESE abuse?
Tags: anti sasusaku anti sss anti sss family anti abuse
ns 15.158.61.8da2
