多謝巴絲們的指正,以下為此Post的更正:439Please respect copyright.PENANAEZQ0OB9EF3
439Please respect copyright.PENANAHuS9h4U5Tr
三十秒科學–種樹是否一定能夠減低大氣二氧化碳含量?439Please respect copyright.PENANAOj2m2ZPL52
- 分享自 LIHKG 討論區439Please respect copyright.PENANAAk9BR66mmR
https://lih.kg/2544217439Please respect copyright.PENANAAAY31yf5Ww
439Please respect copyright.PENANAbgoqsSrOuP
439Please respect copyright.PENANArabGHEijGa
圖片摘取自Ref1及2439Please respect copyright.PENANA8QOQYVw21Y439Please respect copyright.PENANAPZi5GzynKR
439Please respect copyright.PENANAz3tNIlsQ4o
439Please respect copyright.PENANAbZISd5gLqd
研究中指出草叢/部份樹木因配合泥土菌類獲取營養方式的不同,雖長得比較矮小,但能夠在泥土儲存較多的碳原子。439Please respect copyright.PENANAaaDyOOJGTK
439Please respect copyright.PENANA0FBkcge6QC
而部分樹木因依靠泥土中的菌類幫忙,得以長得更高,而與此同時泥土相關的菌類則會釋放出更多的二氧化碳。439Please respect copyright.PENANAWMfeKgZypE
439Please respect copyright.PENANAfRVJEYkD25
雖然長大較高的樹木比較低的草叢有更強的能力透過光合作用儲存碳原子,但相應地,助長樹木生長的菌類亦會從泥土中釋發出比助長草叢生長的菌類更多的二氧化碳。439Please respect copyright.PENANAIgRIkTWD6c
439Please respect copyright.PENANAkLDkhGW4v9
研究中並無證據直接顯示草叢吸取大氣二氧化碳的能力比樹木更高,上一篇我引述錯誤,若然引起任何誤會,希望可以見諒。439Please respect copyright.PENANAvIQ95tH1fm
439Please respect copyright.PENANANjvGNqggRZ
Ref1:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01117-5439Please respect copyright.PENANA7RpDW2V8qs
Ref2:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00737-1
439Please respect copyright.PENANAA0Rit2FXWz