多謝巴絲們的指正,以下為此Post的更正:363Please respect copyright.PENANAhNB56fQtQG
363Please respect copyright.PENANAjzMnRpUBZ5
三十秒科學–種樹是否一定能夠減低大氣二氧化碳含量?363Please respect copyright.PENANAT7EkS5LoKW
- 分享自 LIHKG 討論區363Please respect copyright.PENANAeV21vGrt7H
https://lih.kg/2544217363Please respect copyright.PENANAYjaAA3JljO
363Please respect copyright.PENANAnEEUIYlsne
363Please respect copyright.PENANAwbhsUf45h3
圖片摘取自Ref1及2363Please respect copyright.PENANAXSAiclwiaH
363Please respect copyright.PENANALYCi3ubzfy
363Please respect copyright.PENANAdliEFz7E81
363Please respect copyright.PENANANiP6CwewSe
研究中指出草叢/部份樹木因配合泥土菌類獲取營養方式的不同,雖長得比較矮小,但能夠在泥土儲存較多的碳原子。363Please respect copyright.PENANAokB9maC5qn
363Please respect copyright.PENANAQwrzp1hkvl
而部分樹木因依靠泥土中的菌類幫忙,得以長得更高,而與此同時泥土相關的菌類則會釋放出更多的二氧化碳。363Please respect copyright.PENANARVMhoE4eLB
363Please respect copyright.PENANAdv1Y7wji8m
雖然長大較高的樹木比較低的草叢有更強的能力透過光合作用儲存碳原子,但相應地,助長樹木生長的菌類亦會從泥土中釋發出比助長草叢生長的菌類更多的二氧化碳。363Please respect copyright.PENANAJiA8XRuh1n
363Please respect copyright.PENANACGQvtwsvG6
研究中並無證據直接顯示草叢吸取大氣二氧化碳的能力比樹木更高,上一篇我引述錯誤,若然引起任何誤會,希望可以見諒。363Please respect copyright.PENANAsfrOEtyAjV
363Please respect copyright.PENANAvtCru3L4bC
Ref1:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01117-5363Please respect copyright.PENANAgoMf70nZOL
Ref2:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00737-1
363Please respect copyright.PENANAbOWxckPSgl